i think there are a difference between bella in the movies and bella in the books..
in the book , she was very awkward..clumsy...i missed her poor Balance..her strange expressions..
but in the movies ,she is not like that..kristen did a great job as bella swan but i really missed bella in the books..who agree with me ?
Yea I argee in the book she is so different, although being more clumsy and accident prone in the book which brings some light hearted humor into it, she is also stronger emotionaly in my opinion because in the book when she goes to meet James in the ballet studio she is happy to see her mother isn't there and not really bothered about the fact James plans to kill her but in the film that doesn't show through really. Also she doesn't seem to bond as much with Jacob as she does in the book
When I first saw Kristen as Bella I thought that she had little sex appeal . she seems to act very boyish in all of the sagas.
Yet she has chemistry with Edward and Jacob! I think that is because of the directing on the show. Don't get me wrong I think that Kristen is a beautiful girl and love her acting in the twilight series.She just "works" . I've always been drawn to Vampire movies.I was fascinated with The Vampire Lestat books and read them all.But I think the Twilight saga is even better. I think that each of the characters are great ,
YES it so true that Kristen is the best for Bella to go along with Edward and Jacob. The directorsand producres and everyone else for picking the right actors and actress's.
Then for Lestatboh books and movie ie., "Queen of the Damned" are also facinating only the love story is a whole different world. No matter how you look at it Vampires are here to stay