Poll: Would you pay extra money to see Breaking Dawn if it were 2.5 or 3 hours and included everything?

I've been thinking that I would totally pay extra money and time to watch Breaking Dawn the way it was written. I understand that time does not move as fast while reading it and they need to speed things up and make more action for a movie to keep the story moving.

I know that most of you would also love nothing more than if Breaking Dawn (each part) was 2.5 or 3 hours and didn't leave out scenes. I don't think the rules apply when it comes to Twilight fans...we wouldn't fall into the " the average audience can only sit in a theater and still maintain interest for 2 hours on average".

It's our last movie and I want no compromises, no details spared...(maybe make the ending more intense imho)!!!

What all do you think?

Tags: and, bella, breaking, dawn, edward, movie, script, wedding

Comment by Lin on July 30, 2010 at 6:50pm: I would go if it was even longer, I went to see Malcolm X years ago, that movie was about 4 hours long, they did an audience break in the middle- if it was kept true to the book I would say yes, but I would think it would take a lot more time to film the movie and therefore the actors may have other commitments that they couldn't get out of. As far as people coming to see it who are not fans of Twilight, well, I don't think the time element is gonna sway them one way or the other as to whether or not they are gonna see it in the first place.

Comment by Mrs. Pattinson on July 30, 2010 at 7:10pm: YES!!!

Comment by Genevieve on July 30, 2010 at 7:11pm: What I want is 2 parts, everything included :)

Comment by Sam on July 30, 2010 at 7:11pm: HELL YEAH ! butt i dont want it to be together . like , id rather it be two separate movies then them together . like with gone with the wind .

Comment by Katherine Marie on July 30, 2010 at 7:12pm: no hesitation. YESSSS!!!

Comment by andsothelionfellinlovewithdannie on July 30, 2010 at 7:13pm: hell yes! i'll totally pay extra money too see Breaking Dawn just the way is on the book.

Comment by tWiLiGhT fReAk on July 30, 2010 at 7:16pm: of course i would!!! but yea a normal person could only sit through 2 hours of a twilight movie

Comment by Melissa Connelly on July 30, 2010 at 7:17pm: No. I don't want to see a slow-paced movie. And it'd do crap at the box office. I'm sure a decently timed movie would get a bit more than that.

Comment by ^{[(PhOiMoS)]}^ on July 30, 2010 at 7:18pm: I totally agree, and should have concideracion with fans, the saga has raised thousands of dollars covering so all expectations and satisfy all, then do not see that they not can give us 2.5 or 3 hours in the movies....