Salary dispute holding up 'Twilight 5' announcement

EXCLUSIVE: Summit Entertainment is working furiously to close the talent deals required to split Stephenie Meyer's fourth "Twilight" novel into two films. But an unlikely roadblock is
holding up an announcement -- and could even lead to cast changes for
the series' final installment.

The studio is close to finalizing agreements with leads Kristen Stewart, Robert Pattinson and Taylor Lautner, all of whom will get big raises to return for a fifth
installment of the vampire romance saga. And director Bill Condon is
already signed to film two "Breaking Dawn" movies, which would be shot
back-to-back starting in the fall and released in November 2011 and
summer 2012, respectively.

But Summit is having a harder time locking in some of the franchise's secondary characters. Deals for Peter Facinelli (who plays Carlisle Cullen) and Billy Burke (Bella's father,
Charlie Swan) are done, but we're told the actors who play the Cullen
kids (especially Kellan Lutz and Ashley Greene) are trying to sink their
teeth into bigger paydays that, at least at this point, the studio
behind the billion-dollar franchise is unwilling to provide. "We may
have a situation where one of them is thrown out on the street to make a
point," says a source close to the dealmaking.

So are we headed for a recasting on the final "Twilight"?

There is precedent for such a tactic. After the success of the first film, Summit axed Rachelle Lefevre, who played Victoria, in part because her reps played hardball
on money and scheduling. (Bryce Dallas Howard got the job instead.) Now,
two films into the series, even the minor Twilighters (Lutz in
particular) have become sought-after stars, so it makes sense they'd
want to be paid more for the final film. But we're told that the offers
from Summit -- which are said to be at least 10 times what the actors
made on the first movie -- were deemed "offensive" given the mega-money
the franchise has generated.




Summit declined to comment on the situation. But the studio wants to move quickly to pull the trigger on the two movies -- which it won't until the talent deals are further along -- and it isn't afraid to
recast if agreements can't be reached. Plus, it has even more reason to
be concerned about costs this time around. As is typical with
blockbuster franchises, the "Twilight" movies are becoming more
expensive with each installment. The leads are going to fare especially
well if "Breaking Dawn" is split into two parts. The trio were initially
signed for three films (remember, this was back when "Twilight" was a
low-budget adaptation of a niche YA novel), but in the spring of 2009 --
after the first movie became an international hit -- they renegotiated all
their deals so Summit could lock them for a fourth movie.

The studio then realized that "Breaking Dawn," with its 900-plus pages and
narratives told from two perspectives, was dense enough to be split into
two installments (as Warner Bros. announced it would do for the final
"Harry Potter" book). Just one problem: The cast wasn't signed for a
fifth movie. They're all huge stars now, with Lautner in particular
running up his quote to the $7.5 million range, so another renegotiation
commenced.

That meant ponying up big-time for the leads, which would make the final movie more expensive than the others ("Eclipse," which hits theaters June 30, is costing around $65 million, a figure
sure to be dwarfed by the fourth and fifth, even if costs can be
amortized by shooting them at the same time). Summit is still holding
out the option of simply doing one "Breaking Dawn," although multiple
sources say they'd be shocked if the fifth film doesn't happen. "This
thing is gonna be two movies," one source says. "With or without the
cast intact." Meyer has already signed off on the plan to make two — a
key hurdle, given the approval rights she has in her deal.

Summit also is eyeing another cost-cutting measure for the final installments. A deal is currently being negotiated to move the production to
Louisiana (the first was shot in Portland and the second two in
Vancouver and Italy). Luring "Twilight" would be a huge "get" for the
state -- and, given the tax credits, a money-saver for the studio.

"Twilight" has thus far been the rare tentpole franchise made on a non-tentpole budget. It'll be interesting to see the lengths that Summit will go to
to keep it there. Booting an actor from the final installment of a
successful series could be a risky move, though we're betting that as
long as their precious Bella, Edward and Jacob return, fans would get
over any disappointment pretty quickly


SOURCE

Views: 6

Comment by ElarieJaymes on May 11, 2010 at 9:23am
Wohh, i can't believe they're considering recasting. I also can't believe it won't come out till November.. 2011! i'm sorry, but thats ridiculous, as i'm sure you'll all agree. new moon was shot in what, march? april? and they got it out in november. i can't see why it'll take a whole year to push this movie into the theatres. and, what does it mean, Meyer has already signed off on the plan to make two — a key hurdle, given the approval rights she has in her deal.
Please explain! god, i reaaally hope they don't recast, and i really REALLY hope it doesn't take as long as that to come out..
Comment by michelle on May 11, 2010 at 4:08pm
wow i will be deeply hurt if they recast.. there is no way it will be the same even if it is just the supporting actors that get replaced it will be a big blow to the twilight series.. another thing i dont know how reliable this information is so i am going to take it with a grain of salt and hopefully sumit will pull through for us

Comment

You need to be a member of TwiFans-Twilight Saga books and Movie Fansite to add comments!

Join TwiFans-Twilight Saga books and Movie Fansite

Advertising

FANGIRL WITH US HERE

© 2014    

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger... Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger... Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...